Latest Updates

Posted On: 22-06-2026
117. (SC) (Decided on: 01.06.2026)

***

Pension -- Temporary status casual labourers – Entitled to pensionary benefits even without formal regularisation.

***

A. Casual Labourers (Grant of Temporary Status and Regularisation) Scheme, 1991 -- Central Civil Services (Temporary Service) Rules, 1965,  Rule 10(1-B) -- Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 -- Pension -- Temporary status casual labourers -- Formal regularisation -- Casual labourers conferred temporary status and, after completion of three years, treated at par with temporary Group ‘D’ employees -- Benefits admissible to temporary Group ‘D’ employees held to include pensionary benefits -- Entitlement to pension not dependent upon formal regularisation -- Temporary status casual labourers held entitled to pensionary benefits on superannuation even in absence of regularisation.

(Paras 52 to 76)

B. Casual Labourers (Grant of Temporary Status and Regularisation) Scheme, 1991, Clauses 6, 7 and 8 -- Pension -- Interpretation of beneficial scheme -- Expression "after regularisation" occurring in Clause 6 -- Scope -- Clause 6 does not create pensionary entitlement but confers additional benefit of counting 50% of service rendered under temporary status towards retirement benefits upon regularisation -- Absence of regularisation not extinguishing underlying entitlement to pension -- Scheme to be construed harmoniously and in a beneficial manner.

(Paras 47 to 49, 56 and 57)

C. Central Civil Services (Temporary Service) Rules, 1965, Rule 10(1-B) -- Pension -- Temporary Government servants -- Qualifying service -- Temporary status casual labourers treated at par with temporary Group ‘D’ employees -- Upon completion of qualifying service of ten years, entitled to superannuation pension, gratuity and family pension under the Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 -- Pensionary benefits cannot be denied merely on basis of nomenclature or absence of regularisation.

(Paras 70 to 75)

D. Constitution of India, Articles 14, 38, 39, 43 and 300A -- Pension -- Property -- Social welfare measure -- State as model employer -- Pension not a bounty but a vested constitutional right and property within meaning of Article 300A -- Financial burden no ground to deny pensionary benefits earned through long years of service.

(Paras 39 to 41, 74)

E. Service Law -- Delay and laches -- Pensionary benefits -- Continuing cause of action -- Claim for pension cannot be defeated solely on ground of delay -- However, arrears restricted to three years and two months preceding date of filing of Original Applications before Tribunal.

(Para 81)

Posted On: 22-06-2026
118. (SC) (Decided on: 22.05.2026)

***

Quashing of FIR -- Criminal proceedings arising from civil property dispute -- Subsequent FIR containing improved allegations held to be abuse of process.

***

A. Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), Sections 154(3), 156(3), 200 and 482 -- Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act 45 of 1860), Sections 120-B, 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, 384, 504, 506, 511 and 114 – Quashing of proceedings -- Long-standing civil dispute relating to title over immovable property -- FIR lodged after about 8-9 years -- Earlier complaint lodged seven months prior did not contain allegations of extortion or criminal intimidation -- Subsequent FIR lodged introducing allegation of demand of Rs.1.5 crores -- Material improvements in later FIR showing attempt to give criminal colour to civil dispute -- Held, continuation of criminal proceedings would amount to abuse of process of law -- FIR and consequential proceedings liable to be quashed.

(Paras 38 to 40, 52 to 58)

B. Indian Penal Code, 1860 (45 of 1860), Sections 463, 464, 465, 467, 468 and 471 -- Forgery -- False document -- Execution of Power of Attorney by persons claiming share in ancestral property -- No allegation of forged signatures, impersonation or fabrication of document -- Mere claim of title subsequently found unsustainable not amounting to making of a "false document" -- Ingredients of forgery absent -- Offences under Sections 465, 467, 468 and 471 IPC not made out.

(Paras 44 and 45)

C. Indian Penal Code, 1860 (45 of 1860), Section 420 -- Cheating -- Essential ingredients -- Deception, dishonest intention at inception and delivery of property -- No allegation that complainant delivered any property, money or valuable security pursuant to any inducement -- Section 420 IPC not attracted.

(Para 46)

D. Indian Penal Code, 1860 (45 of 1860), Sections 384, 504, 506 and 511 -- Extortion -- Criminal intimidation -- FIR not disclosing date, place or circumstances of alleged demand -- No allegation of delivery of property or money pursuant to threats -- Vague allegations regarding intimidation and insult -- Attempt to extort also not established -- Ingredients of offences absent.

(Paras 47 and 48)

E. Indian Penal Code, 1860 (45 of 1860), Section 120-B -- Criminal conspiracy -- Substantive offences themselves not made out -- Charge of conspiracy cannot survive independently -- Held, offence under Section 120-B IPC also not attracted.

(Para 49)

F. Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), Section 482 -- Criminal antecedents of accused -- Relevance -- Criminal antecedents cannot constitute sole or primary ground to refuse quashing of proceedings -- Court required to examine whether essential ingredients of offences alleged are made out -- Reliance on antecedents by High Court held unsustainable.

(Para 50)

Posted On: 18-06-2026
134. (SC) (Decided on: 11.06.2026)

***

Compassionate appointment — Rule 23(1) of Haryana Civil Services (Compassionate Financial Assistance or Appointment) Rules, 2019 applies only to compassionate financial assistance and not to compassionate appointment — Claim for compassionate appointment cannot be kept in abeyance merely because criminal proceedings concerning death of employee are pending against another family member.

***

A. Haryana Civil Services (Compassionate Financial Assistance or Appointment) Rules, 2019, Rules 5(1)(f), 5(1)(g) and 23(1) -- Compassionate appointment -- Compassionate financial assistance -- Widow accused of murder of deceased employee -- Rule 23(1) expressly governs only compassionate financial assistance -- Neither its language nor marginal heading extends to compassionate appointment -- Reading compassionate appointment into Rule 23(1) would amount to judicial legislation -- Purposive interpretation cannot be employed to introduce words consciously omitted by rule-making authority -- Claim for compassionate appointment cannot be deferred by invoking Rule 23(1) -- Children's claim for compassionate appointment cannot automatically remain suspended till determination of widow's claim.

(Paras 23-39, 42, 46, 48, 50)

B. Service Law -- Compassionate appointment -- Nature and object -- Compassionate appointment is neither a vested nor a heritable right -- It is a welfare measure intended to provide immediate succour to the family of a deceased employee facing financial hardship -- Entitlement remains subject to fulfilment of eligibility conditions prescribed under the governing Rules.

(Paras 20-22)

C. Interpretation of Statutes -- Plain meaning rule -- Purposive interpretation -- Purposive construction cannot be invoked to override clear and unambiguous statutory language or to supply words consciously omitted by Legislature or rule-making authority.

(Paras 25-26)

D. Haryana Civil Services (Compassionate Financial Assistance or Appointment) Rules, 2019, Rules 5(1)(f), 5(1)(g) and 23(1) -- Compassionate appointment -- Compassionate financial assistance -- Legislative omission -- Rules provide for suspension of compassionate financial assistance during pendency of criminal proceedings but contain no analogous restriction regarding compassionate appointment -- Court cannot fill such legislative gap through interpretative process -- Matter lies within legislative domain -- State Government advised to consider suitable amendment to the Rules of 2019.

(Paras 43-45, 48(vi))

Posted On: 15-06-2026
141. (SC) (Decided on: 12.05.2026)

***

Mother tongue-based education -- RTE Act and NEP, 2020 recognise primacy of mother tongue/home language in learning -- Executive inaction and absence of policy no defence – State of Rajasthan directed to recognise Rajasthani for educational purposes and take phased steps for its introduction as medium of instruction and school subject.

***

A. Constitution of India, Articles 19(1)(a), 21A and 350A -- Education -- Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 (35 of 2009), Section 29(2)(f) -- Mother tongue/ language of choice -- Right to freedom of speech and expression includes right to receive education in a language understood by the child -- Education must be intelligible and accessible to the learner -- Instruction in mother tongue facilitates comprehension, meaningful access to knowledge and quality education.

(Paras 35, 39, 42-43)

B. Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 (35 of 2009), Section 29(2)(f) -- National Education Policy, 2020 -- Mother tongue/ home language/ regional language -- Legislature and policy framework recognise foundational role of mother tongue in learning -- Education in unfamiliar language impedes comprehension and defeats purpose of elementary education.

(Paras 17-19, 39-40)

C. Constitution of India, Articles 19(1)(a), 21A and 350A -- Constitutional guarantees -- Executive inaction -- Mother tongue-based education -- Rajasthani language -- Absence of policy framework or non-inclusion of a language in the Eighth Schedule cannot justify failure to implement constitutional and statutory obligations relating to mother tongue-based education -- State of Rajasthan directed to formulate policy recognising Rajasthani as local/regional language for educational purposes and to take phased steps for its introduction as medium of instruction and as a subject in schools.

(Paras 44-50)

Posted On: 14-06-2026
147. (SC) (Decided on: 28.04.2026)

***

Service Law -- Tenure appointment -- Curtailment of tenure -- Appointment for five years "or until further orders, whichever is earlier" -- No enforceable right to complete full tenure -- Judicial review confined to arbitrariness, mala fides, perversity or violation of natural justice.

***

A. Constitution of India, Article 311 -- Service Law -- ICAR employee -- ICAR being an autonomous society governed by its own rules and bye-laws -- Employees not holding civil posts under Union or State -- Protection under Article 311 unavailable.

(Para 9)

B. Service Law -- Tenure post -- Curtailment of tenure -- Appointment for five years or until further orders, whichever earlier -- Competent authority retaining power to curtail tenure before expiry -- Employee acquiring no enforceable right to continue for full tenure period.

(Para 10)

C. Service Law -- Judicial review -- Scope -- Review confined to legality of decision-making process and not merits of administrative assessment -- Courts not to act as appellate authorities over performance evaluation.

(Paras 10, 17)

D. Service Law -- Stigmatic order -- Curtailment of tenure based on Annual Assessment Reports describing performance as "unsatisfactory" and "below average" -- Remarks reflecting assessment of suitability and not misconduct -- Order not stigmatic and not attracting disciplinary safeguards.

(Paras 13, 14)

E. Service Law -- Annual Assessment Reports -- Adverse remarks -- Delayed communication -- Employee afforded opportunity to submit representations -- No consequential prejudice established -- Administrative action based on such AARs not liable to interference.

(Para 14)

F. Service Law -- Mala fides -- Allegation that action was retaliatory -- Mala fides must be established by clear, cogent and specific material -- Cannot be inferred merely from chronology of events, surrounding circumstances or conjectures.

(Para 16)