130. (SC)
(Decided on: 29.05.2026)
***
Approver -- Evidentiary value -- Corroboration -- Conviction may rest on uncorroborated testimony of an approver if Court finds it trustworthy -- Requirement of corroboration is a rule of prudence and not a mandatory rule of law.
***
Approver -- Credibility -- Self-exculpatory testimony -- Mere attribution of a lesser role to oneself does not render approver evidence unreliable.
***
Criminal conspiracy -- Conspirator is liable for every reasonably foreseeable crime committed in reference to common intention of conspirators.
***
Defect in charge -- Failure of justice -- Conviction not vitiated where accused was aware of case against him and suffered no prejudice.
***
Sentence -- Life imprisonment -- Conversion to period already undergone -- Long incarceration and remission granted to co-convicts considered.
***
A. Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (1 of 1872), Sections 133 and 114 Illustration (b) -- Approver -- Evidentiary value -- Corroboration of approver's testimony -- Accomplice is a competent witness and conviction is not illegal merely because it proceeds on uncorroborated testimony -- Requirement of corroboration is a rule of prudence and not a mandatory rule of law-- Court may rely upon uncorroborated approver evidence where it is satisfied that such evidence is trustworthy and safe to act upon and records reasons for such satisfaction -- Corroborative evidence, where considered necessary, may be direct or circumstantial and need not independently prove every material circumstance against accused -- However, corroboration must ordinarily emanate from independent sources and testimony of one approver cannot ordinarily be used to corroborate another approver.
(Para 24-29)
B. Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (1 of 1872), Sections 133 and 114 Ill. (b) -- Approver -- Credibility -- Testimony not wholly exculpatory -- Approver admitting participation in crime though not inflicting fatal injuries -- Held, testimony cannot be discarded merely because approver attributes a greater role to co-accused -- What is material is full and truthful disclosure of occurrence and participation in crime.
(Paras 34 to 39)
C. Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Section 464 -- Charge -- Omission or irregularity -- Conviction challenged on ground that specific charge was not properly framed against accused -- Record showing accused was aware of allegations, claimed trial and cross-examined witnesses on relevant issues -- Held, mere defect, omission or irregularity in framing charge does not vitiate conviction unless failure of justice is demonstrated -- No prejudice having been caused, conviction sustained.
(Paras 41 to 43)
D. Indian Penal Code, 1860 (45 of 1860), Sections 120-B, 396, 302 -- Criminal conspiracy -- Scope of liability -- Agreement to commit dacoity and steal truck -- Driver and cleaner murdered during execution of plan -- Accused claiming non-participation in actual killings -- Held, conspirator is liable for every reasonably foreseeable crime committed in reference to common intention of conspirators -- Murder of victims while forcibly taking possession of truck was a foreseeable consequence of conspiracy -- Conviction for conspiracy to commit murder upheld.
(Paras 50 to 55)
E. Indian Penal Code, 1860 (45 of 1860), Sections 120-B, 396, 302 -- Dacoity – Murder -- Sentence -- Accused not direct assailant, incident pertaining to year 1984, co-convicts granted remission and accused having undergone more than 18 years' imprisonment -- Held, sentence of imprisonment for life deserved modification to period already undergone while maintaining conviction -- Release directed if not required in any other case.
(Paras 57 to 62)