Once the factum of giving money to the accused is proved by the eye witness then; merely because the transaction of loan happens to be subsequent to the date alleged when the money is stated to have been given to the petitioners is totally irrelevant – Witness was deposing after 7-8 years, therefore, such kind of minor discrepancy cannot discredit the entire case of the prosecution.
(P&H HC) Decided on: 20.08.2018