Section 60(1)(i), Order 21 -- Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (26 of 1881), Section 138 -- Award of Lok Adalat in complaint u/s 138 NI Act – Execution of award/ decree -- Attachment of salary -- Salary of the JD-respondent cannot be attached for a period of more than 24 months where such attachment is made in execution of one and the same decree -- Argument of DH-petitioner that the salary should be continued to be attached cannot be accepted in view of the clear provisions of Section 60(1)(i) of CPC.

(P&H HC) Reserved on : 21.10.2022 Decided on: 01.11.2022

Section 55 Order 21 Rule 30 -- Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (26 of 1881), Section 138 -- Award of Lok Adalat in complaint u/s 138 NI Act – Execution of award/ decree – Arrest of Judgment Debtor/ JD -- Argument that the JD-respondent ought to be arrested for non-compliance of the order passed by the Permanent Lok Adalat cannot be accepted in view of the fact that arrest would be a measure of last resort and in the case, some property of the JD-respondent already stands attached and the Executing Court has directed the JD-respondent to file an affidavit stating all the particulars regarding his moveable and immoveable properties.

(P&H HC) Reserved on : 21.10.2022 Decided on: 01.11.2022

Order 21 – Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (26 of 1881), Section 138 -- Cheque bounce case -- Award of Lok Adalat in complaint u/s 138 NI Act – Execution of award -- Award passed by the Lok Adalat would be deemed to be a decree of the Civil Court executable by the Civil Court -- There can be no quarrel with the said proposition of law.

(P&H HC) Reserved on : 21.10.2022 Decided on: 01.11.2022

Section 9 -- Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (26 of 1881), Section 138 – Cheque bounce case -- Acquittal in criminal case – Civil liability to pay -- Claim of the plaintiff was not based on dishonour of the cheques -- It was based on the basis of transaction of supply of poultry feed to the company and the bills raised therefore -- Merely, because defendant has been acquitted in criminal proceeding that does not mean that the claim of the plaintiff in civil proceedings ipso facto stand disproved.

(P&H HC) Decided on: 26.07.2017